top of page
SPECIAL ARTICLE - “MUNTIK NA AKONG MAMATAY KAYA DESERVE KO ‘TO!” - HEART-IG _iamhearte.jpg

Talo sa demandahan nila ni Viva… NADINE, WA' PAKI SA BATAS, TULOY ANG CONCERT

  • BULGAR
  • Jun 16, 2021
  • 2 min read

ni Julie Bonifacio - @Winner | June 16, 2021




Inatasan ng Quezon City Regional Trial Court ang aktres na si Nadine Lustre na i-uphold ang kanyang kontrata sa Viva Artists Agency (VAA).


Ito ang naging resolusyon ng korte sa inihain na petisyon ng VAA to grant them the “interim measures of protection” sa kontrata ni Nadine sa kanila.


"Petitioner (Viva) has established its unequivocal right arising from the subject Revised Agency and Management Agreement. It has established that respondent (Nadine) contracted with them to act as sole and exclusive manager for respondent’s exercise of profession in the show business," bahagi ng resolusyong inilabas ng QC RTC.


On the other hand, kine-claim din ng kampo ni Nadine, especially her lawyer na si Atty. Lorna Kapunan, na panalo pa rin ang aktres sa naging desisyon ng korte sa kaso.


Dinenay daw kasi ng korte ang karapatan ng Viva over Nadine’s hard-earned earnings and bank accounts, ayon sa abogado ni Nadine na si Atty. Kapunan.


But take note, "bank accounts," hah? Not one, but many!


Pero ito ang tiyak na magiging issue na naman ngayon. Dahil kahit may desisyon na ang korte sa kontrata ni Nadine sa VAA, tuloy pa rin daw ang concert ng ex-GF ni James Reid titled Absolute Madness on July 3.


Hindi pa naman daw kasi final ang cease and desist order at may 15 days to appeal pa si Nadine sa decision ng korte.


"Tuloy ang concert. We will file a motion for reconsideration," sabi ni Kapunan sa ABS-CBN News.


Naglabas din ng statement si Nadine through Atty. Kapunan regarding the decision of the court.

"I remain focused to giving good entertainment at this time as my contribution to everyone's sound mental health," mensahe ni Nadine.


Inilahad din ni Atty. Kapunan ang desisyon ng korte sa alegasyon ng VAA na intensiyon ni Nadine na i-defraud sila.


She may have breached the agreement in 2019; however that fact alone is not enough to sufficiently support that she had intended to defraud Viva at the time she entered into an agency agreement," ayon pa kay Judge Jose Paneda in his June 11 decision.


Ito ay dahil sa katotohanang nag-stay pa rin daw sa VAA si Nadine for 20 years.


‘Yun na!

Comments


Disclaimer : The views and opinions expressed on this website or any comments found on any articles herein, are those of the authors or columnists alike, and do not necessarily reflect nor represent the views and opinions of the owner, the company, the management and the website.

RECOMMENDED
bottom of page