Matagal nang nagsasaka, automatikong tenant na ba?

ni PAO Chief Persida Rueda-Acosta @Magtanong Kay Attorney | October 15, 2026

Dear Chief Acosta,

May isang tao pong matagal nang nagsasaka sa lupa ng aming pamilya. Dahil dito, sinasabi niyang tenant na siya. Tama po ba na nagiging agricultural tenant ang isang tao dahil lamang sa matagal na niyang pagsasaka sa lupa? — Pokwari

---

Dear Pokwari, 

Ang sagot sa iyong katanungan ay matatagpuan sa Republic Act (R.A.) No. 3844, na inamiyendahan, o ang Code of Agrarian Reforms of the Philippines, at sa mga kaugnay na desisyon ng Korte Suprema. Para sa iyong kaalaman, nakasaad sa Seksyon 166(2) ng nasabing batas:

“(2) ‘Agricultural lessee’ means a person who, by himself and with the aid available from within his immediate farm household, cultivates the land belonging to, or possessed by, another with the latter's consent for purposes of production, for a price certain in money or in produce or both. It is distinguished from civil law lessee as understood in the Civil Code of the Philippines.” 

Makikita sa nasabing probisyon na hindi sapat ang aktuwal na pagsasaka lamang. Kailangan ding may pahintulot (consent) ng may-ari o legal possessor, at ang paglilinang ay bahagi ng isang agricultural leasehold relationship.

Kaugnay nito, sa kasong Antonio Pagarigan vs. Angelita Yague and Shirley Asuncion, G.R. No. 195203, ika-20 ng Abril 2015, na isinulat ni Kagalang-galang na Kasamang Mahistrado Arturo D. Brion, iginiit ng nagpetisyon na nagkaroon ng implied tenancy dahil tinatanggap umano ng may-ari ng lupa ang kanilang mga inihatid na palay. Gayunman, ipinaliwanag ng Korte Suprema:

“The following are the essential elements of an agricultural tenancy relationship: (1) the parties are the landowner and the tenant or agricultural lessee; (2) the subject matter of the relationship is agricultural land; (3) there is consent between the parties to the relationship; (4) the purpose of the relationship is to bring about agricultural production; (5) there is personal cultivation on the part of the tenant or agricultural lessee; and (6) the harvest is shared between the landowner and the tenant or agricultural lessee. In our review of the present case, we agree with the CA that the element of consent from the landowner to the petitioner's tenancy is absent.

We have consistently held that occupancy and cultivation of an agricultural land, no matter how long, will not ipso facto make one a de jure tenant. Independent and concrete evidence is necessary to prove personal cultivation, sharing of harvest, or consent of the landowner. We emphasize that the presence of a tenancy relationship cannot be presumed; the elements for its existence are explicit in law and cannot be done away with by mere conjectures. Leasehold relationship is not brought about by the mere congruence of facts but, being a legal relationship, the mutual will of the parties to that relationship should be primordial.”

Malinaw sa kasong nabanggit sa itaas na kahit matagal nang inuukupa at sinasaka ang isang lupang pang-agrikultura, hindi ito sapat upang awtomatikong maging de jure tenant ang isang tao. Kailangang may independyente at konkretong ebidensya ng mga rekisito ng tenancy.

Ganito rin ang naging paliwanag sa kasong Primitivo Macalanda, Jr. vs. Atty. Roque A. Acosta, G.R. No. 197718, ika-6 ng Setyembre 2017, na isinulat ni Kagalang-galang na Kasamang Mahistrado Noel G. Tijam), kung saan sinabi ng Korte Suprema:

“The presence of all these elements must be proved by substantial evidence, thus, the absence of one will not make an alleged tenant a de jure tenant. Unless a person has established his status as a de jure tenant, he is not entitled to security of tenure or to be covered by the Land Reform Program of the Government under existing tenancy laws. Crucial for the creation of tenancy relations would be the existence of two of the essential elements, namely, consent and sharing and/or payment of lease rentals. The existence of a tenancy relationship cannot be presumed and allegations that one is a tenant do not automatically gives rise to security of tenure.”

Samakatuwid, hindi awtomatikong nagiging agricultural tenant ang isang tao dahil lamang sa matagal na niyang pagsasaka sa lupa. Kailangang mapatunayan ang lahat ng mahahalagang elemento ng tenancy, lalo na ang pahintulot ng may-ari ng lupa at ang pagbabahagi o pagbabayad ng lease rentals. Ang tagal ng paglilinang ay maaaring bahagi ng ebidensiya, ngunit hindi ito sapat upang lumikha ng agricultural tenancy relationship.

Sana ay nabigyan namin ng linaw ang iyong katanungan. Ang payong aming ibinigay ay base lamang sa impormasyong iyong inilahad at maaaring magbago kung mababawasan o madaragdagan ang mga detalye ng iyong salaysay.

Maraming salamat sa iyong patuloy na pagtitiwala.