top of page
BULGARY - SEN. ROBIN, MAY P150 M AMBAG SA PHIL. FILM HERITAGE, BUILDING ‘DI PA RIN NATAPOS

Angel, tinawag na walang utak, naghamon ng suntukan… NEIL SINOPLA, 'DI PINATULAN NI PIA USEC.

  • BULGAR
  • Sep 16, 2021
  • 3 min read

CUALOPING


ni Beth Gelena - @Bulgary Files | September 16, 2021



Hindi pa rin pala tapos ang isyu ni Phil. Information Agency Undersecretary Mon Cualoping kay Angel Locsin dahil sa naging pahayag ng aktres na sa panahon ng pandemya, hindi mga pulis at government officials ang kailangan kundi mga healthcare workers.


Muling nag-post ang Usec. na may patama pa rin sa aktres.


Ani Cualoping: “TO THOSE LACKING BRAIN CELLS


“You may have forgotten. We are all taxpayers.


“Via income tax deducted from my salary and VAT through consumptions of goods.


“If you insists that you are paying for my salary, I can also say that I am subsidizing my own compensation. But this is ridiculous.


“Change your fallacious argument please.”


Sa post na ito ay nagkomento si Arlene Muhlach.


Aniya, “Grabe, there are so many acquaintances that you can lambast that truly affects our lives as Filipinos and here you go looking for someone who can UP your popularity by ruining what is pure and comes from the heart???!!!


“Nahanap mo pa talaga siya at ang comment n'ya?! ‘Wag naman ganu'n! 'Wag manggamit para makilala. Puwede naman sa malinis na paraan para mag-ingay at mapansin ng mga botante!


“Kailangan bang gumamit ng sikat na may kasabay na paninira?


“Respeto naman! Makapanlait ka, grabe! Ayusin mo mundo mo. You are supposed to serve the Filipino people. Hindi maghanap ng sikat to ride their coattails via negativity.”


Aba, hindi nagpatalo si Cualoping at sinagot si Arlene.


Heto ang sagot ng kawani ng gobyerno, “To be honest, I am quite confused with your comment. But I tried to decipher what you said.”


At sinabi pa ni Cualoping na since day 1 nu’ng 2016 ay consistent na niyang dinedepensahan ang gobyerno, huh!


At ‘di rin daw siya naka-follow sa socmed ni Angel, all over the news daw kasi ang komento nito at du'n niya nalaman.


“Therefore, it’s a public comment. Thus, my right to comment on it too.


"I serve the Republic. And it is my duty to protect the Republic from wokes who continue to destroy country.”


Eto naman ang komento ng mga netizens.


“He ignored the acquaintances comment. Totoo naman kasi.”


“2016 pa raw siya tagapagtanggol ng gobyerno. In short, aso. Disipulo ni Duterte. Mic drop na. Useless 'yan. Walang ipinagkaiba 'yan sa tagasunod ng isang bulaang propeta.”


“Ang epal lang this Mon Cupaling.”


“He was bombarded with comments sa FB page n'ya, hahahaha! 'Di makasagot sa mga bashers. Nag-delete na lang nang nag-delete ng comments. Bwahahahaha. So, sino ngayon ang walang brain cells? 'Di ba kayo na INUTIL sa gobyerno!”


“This Mon should not have attacked Ms. Locsin below the belt. He could have used better language in sending his message to her and to the public.


“Instead, what did he do? He used foul and crass language. Nakita tuloy how he thinks. So superior. Mapagmataas. Servant ba ng public or servant ng amo niya. Ang bastos lang. Mal-edukado.”


“What's his point?? It doesn't change the fact na pasuweldo siya ng taxes ng taumbayan. And napakaraming kapalpakan ng gobyerno, why is he insisting na hindi dapat punahin ang mali? Is that his meaning of being a "defender of the government"? Kaya ang daming kalokohang nagaganap, eh, dahil sa ganyang mentality.”


“So, bawal palang mag-post ng kahit ano itong si Angel dahil may mga nakaabang na pulitiko sa kanyang mga socmed accounts? Bawat dighay ni Angel or sinok niya, may nagpo-police, ganu'n?”


Samantala, may sagot din si Cualoping sa hamon ng mister ni Angel na magsuntukan na lang sila.


Aniya, "1. To those insisting that I go on a fist fight with the husband, I will not because it does not solve anything. It’s not the crux of the matter.


"2. Also, the gender card shouldn’t be played here because discourse is discourse. This is not a case of misogyny. Not at all.


"3. Respect has been accorded. I did not body shame anyone nor I made it personal. Nor questioned her profession and intention to help people. I just said what I had to say to put things in perspective."

Comments


Disclaimer : The views and opinions expressed on this website or any comments found on any articles herein, are those of the authors or columnists alike, and do not necessarily reflect nor represent the views and opinions of the owner, the company, the management and the website.

RECOMMENDED
bottom of page